您现在的位置: 优易学 >> 外语考试 >> 英语六级 >> 阅读理解 >> 正文
2007年12月大学英语六级阅读理解题冲刺辅导(十)
来源:优易学  2011-12-18 10:39:13   【优易学:中国教育考试门户网】   资料下载   外语书店

26.The author says that the powerful computers of today ______.

   A) are capable of reliably recognizing the shape of an object

   B) are close to exhibiting humanlike behavior

   C) are not very different in their performance from those of the 50's

   D) still cannot communicate with people in a human language

 

27.The new trend in artificial intelligence research stems from ______.

   A) the shift of the focus of study on to the recognition of the shapes of objects

   B) the belief that human intelligence cannot be duplicated with logical, step-by-step programs

   C) the aspirations of scientists to duplicate the intelligence of a ten-month-old child   

   D) the efforts made by scientists in the study of the similarities between transistors and brain cells

 

28.Conrad and his group of AI researchers have been making enormous efforts to ______.

   A) find a roundabout way to design powerful computers

   B) build a computer using a clever network of switches

   C) find out how intelligence developed in nature

   D) separate the highest and most abstract levels of thought

 

29.What's the author's opinion about the new AI movement?

   A) It has created a sensation among artificial intelligence researchers but will soon die out.

   B) It's a breakthrough in duplicating human thought processes.

   C) It's more like a peculiar game rather than a real scientific effort.

   D) It may prove to be in the right direction though nobody is sure of its future prospects.

 

30.Which of the following is closest in meaning to the phrase "the only game in town" (Line 3, Para. 4)?

   A) The only approach to building an artificially intelligent computer.

   B) The only way for them to win a prize in artificial intelligence research.

   C) The only area worth studying in computer science.

   D) The only game they would like to play in town.

 

In the 1950s, the pioneers of artificial intelligence (AI) predicted that, by the end of this century, computers would be conversing with us at work and robots would be performing our housework. But as useful as computers are, they're nowhere close to achieving anything remotely resembling these early aspirations for humanlike behavior. Never mind something as complex as conversation: the most powerful computers struggle to reliably recognize the shape of an object, the most elementary of tasks for a ten-month-old kid.

    A growing group of AI researchers think they know where the field went wrong. The problem, the scientists say, is that AI has been trying to separate the highest, most abstract levels of thought, like language and mathematics, and to duplicate them with logical, step-by-step programs. A new movement in AI, on the other hand, takes a closer look at the more roundabout way in which nature came up with intelligence. Many of these researchers study evolution and natural adaptation instead of formal logic and conventional computer programs. Rather than digital computers and transistors, some want to work with brain cells and proteins. The results of these early efforts are as promising as they are peculiar, and the new nature-based AI movement is slowly but surely moving to the forefront of the field.

    Imitating the brain's neural (神经的) network is a huge step in the right direction, says computer scientist and biophysicist Michael Conrad, but it still misses an important aspect of natural intelligence. "People tend to treat the brain as if it were made up of color-coded transistors", he explains, "but it's not simply a clever network of switches. There are lots of important things going on  inside the brain cells themselves." Specifically, Conrad believes that many of the brain's capabilities stem from the pattern recognition proficiency of the individual molecules that make up each brain cell. The best way to build and artificially intelligent device, he claims, would be to build it around the same sort of molecular skills.

    Right now, the notion that conventional computers and software are fundamentally incapable of matching the processes that take place in the brain remains controversial. But if it proves true, then the efforts of Conrad and his fellow AI rebels could turn out to be the only game in town.

 

 

与原文一模一样的数字、大写字母的选项都不对

上一页  [1] [2] [3] [4] 下一页

责任编辑:虫虫

文章搜索:
 相关文章
热点资讯
热门课程培训