GMAT考试-Testprep数学精解7
来源:优易学  2010-1-23 13:12:30   【优易学:中国教育考试门户网】   资料下载   外语书店
 A common question on the GMAT asks you to find the suppressed premise of an

  argument. Finding the suppressed premise, or assumption, of an argument can

  be difficult. However, on the GMAT you have an advantage——the suppressed pre

  mise is listed as one of the five answer-choices. To test whether an answer-

  choice is a suppressed premise, ask yourself whether it would make the argum

  ent more plausible. If so, then it is very likely a suppressed premise.

  Example:

  American attitudes tend to be rather insular, but there is much we can learn

  from other countries. In Japan, for example, workers set aside some time ea

  ch day to exercise, and many corporations provide elaborate exercise facilit

  ies for their employees. Few American corporations have such exercise progra

  ms. Studies have shown that the Japanese worker is more productive than the

  American worker. Thus it must be concluded that the productivity of American

  workers will lag behind their Japanese counterparts, until mandatory exerci

  se programs are introduced.

  The conclusion of the argument is valid if which one of the following is ass

  umed?

  (A) Even if exercise programs do not increase productivity, they will improv

  e the American worker's health.

  (B) The productivity of all workers can be increased by exercise.

  (C) Exercise is an essential factor in the Japanese worker's superior produc

  tivity.

  (D) American workers can adapt to the longer Japanese work week.

  (E) American corporations don't have the funds to build elaborate exercise f

  acilities.

  The unstated essence of the argument is that exercise is an integral part of

  productivity and that Japanese workers are more productive than American wo

  rkers because they exercise more. The answer is (C)。

  Counter-Premises

  When presenting a position, you obviously don't want to argue against yourse

  lf. However, it is often effective to concede certain minor points that weak

  en your argument. This shows that you are open-minded and that your ideas ar

  e well considered. It also disarms potential arguments against your position

  …… For instance, in arguing for a strong, aggressive police department, you m

  ay concede that in the past the police have at times acted too aggressively.

  Of course, you will then need to state more convincing reasons to support y

  our position

责任编辑:sealion1986

文章搜索:
 相关文章
热点资讯
热门课程培训